To Evaluate my Assignment Click Here
Topic: Ann Gray’s concept of knowability with reference to ‘The Sense of an Ending’
Course No. 13: The New
Literature
Roll No. : 28
Enrollment no.:
PG14101019
Prepared by: Vaishali
Hareshbhai Jasoliya
Submitted to: MAHARAJA
KRISHNAKUMARSINHJI BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
Introduction:
Ann Gray in ‘Research Practice for Cultural
studies’ (2003) elaborates three fundamental research questions that structure
any research project.
1. What is there that can be known – what is
Knowable?
2. What is the relation of the knower to the
known?
How do we find things out?
The Sense of an Ending:
The
Sense of an Ending (2011) is a
novel written by British author Julian Barnes. The Man Booker Prize winner
novel is famous for its postmodern narrative technique, as memory novel and
psychological thriller.
The story
is of an old man Tony Webster,
narrator, who tries to revisit his past and solve some of unsolved mysteries.
His quest for getting knowledge about his friend – Adrian’s suicide and other characters lives can be elaborated with
concept of knowability and three methodological questions.
·
What is there that can
be known – what is Knowable?
This
question is an ontological question; it
refers to the aspect of social reality to be studies, but it also deals with
assumptions we are willing to make about the nature of reality. It requires you
to take a position in relation to your project and to define your ‘knowable space’. How you construct
your knowable space will depend upon your theoretical approach to the social
world and the actors or texts involved.
(Gray)
With reference to The Sense of an Ending Illustrations from the
text:
The novel describes journey or quest of getting knowledge
of Tony Webster, who didn’t get, who never get properly!! The narrator tells
his story and all the incidents with his memory and tries to evaluate past, and
with that he also tries to get knowledge.
For Tony
‘knowable’ is not only to know the reason of Adrian’s suicide or his diary
or about Veronica but also to know about his own life, to illustrate his own
memory and self examine, why he is not getting or what is problem with him. As
it is mentioned in explanation that,
“…it
also deals with assumptions we are willing to make about the nature of
reality…”
Here,
while in the process of getting knowledge, assumes many things at different
stages.
For
example:
Tony
is in assumption that ‘he knows’ all the things. After getting letter, he
supposes that he now knows about Veronica and Adrian. After watching Adrian’s
son, he becomes very sure that now he knows all the things very well but he
didn’t get anything or reach to true knowledge. With these stages his ‘Knowable
space’ is also changing and moving.
“How you construct your
knowable space and how you go about exploring and investigating that knowable
space will depend upon your theoretical approach…”
Here we can say that, Tony does not stop with his
assumptions like Silas in The Da Vinci
Code. In both texts we can found his one of the knowable space is “himself”. In ‘The Sense of an Ending’
one of the reasons of his keep investigation and processing towards knowledge,
ignoring his assumptions, is his “self” as knowable space and his approach
towards other events like Veronica’s
words “you still don’t get it…” or other characters’ attitude towards
him and his own memory, who tells him as he is not able to get sense. He keeps on trying to reach true knowledge
with his approach of investigating like going into several pubs and shops
several times, ignoring his believed, constructed assumptions.
·
What is the relation of the knower to the known?
This question is epistemological and put simply, asks how we know that what we
know. What we bring to our work, how our own knowledge and experience is
brought to bear on the research itself will certainly shape it.
It is
important to make these explicit. The point about who we are and how we relate
to the project itself is a key issue. (Gray)
Relationship
between knower and known is very important to evaluate. In the novel, Tony
tells his own experiences with his memory. He is in self search and also in
search of reasons and relations of other character’s life. He is insider. In
his attempts of knowing anything himself becomes barrier.
For
Example:
His
memory, a mirror or self projection always distract him.
He
knows that Adrian and veronica have relationship after break up with her and,
he also came to know from his friend that Adrian was happy and in love before
his death. With these two statements, he makes an assumption that the reason
for Adrian’s death or before his death he is in love with Veronica.
Only
because of his partial memory, he cannot know that Adrian has relationship with
Mrs. Sarah Ford. He is subjective and inside his memory and assumptions, he
cannot know the things clearly. All the time, he gets true knowledge from
outside.
Like,
he comes to know about his cruel letter when it is given by Veronica. He can
know himself when Margaret communicates with him. Even he gets the “knowledge” about young Adrian when
other person Terry tells him that “Mary
is not his mother, but sister…”
So, when ‘he is in own’, he cannot reach
to the knowledge. Even when he assumes that the young Adrian is son of Adrian
and Veronica, if Veronica did not tell him “You still don’t get…” perhaps he
can never reach to his knowledge. Thus, in Tony’s case the relationship is self
with self and self itself becomes barrier of knowledge. And whenever Tony
becomes objective, he gets knowledge from outside and reach where he wants to…
So, his
view is from inside and he perceive reality from outside.
·
How do we find things out?
This
is methodological questions. What kind of methods must I employ in order to
know, or to put me in a position of being able to interpret and analysis this
aspect of the social world?
Illustrations
from the text:
With
example of both chapters and narrative style, we can say, Tony always tries to
aware readers that, whatever he is telling is not hundred percent true but it
is what he remembers. Tony, in his narration, goes on deconstructing his own
words. He even accepts even accepts that what he said is not trustworthy but with his own
cast of mind. Some of beautiful quotes in the novel suggest this thing clearly.
One of the way,
to get knowledge of Tony, is to become out of own self. At some stage, he
accepts that, “he is not getting sense” means he knows that still he has to
work hard to get knowledge (not like Silas or Fache in Da Vinci Code)
Though he
constructed many assumptions in his case, from outside, he is also getting some
kind of hints or knowledge which proves that he is not getting properly. So, he
is not in blindness, but he keeps trying.
At every stage,
he comes to know from outside. He knows his relationship with known and also
barriers of his knowledge. So, he tries to be objective from subjective. He
rejects his assumptions and accepts hints from outside with being objective.
He doubts his
statements and tries to think the way knowledge comes to him from outside. In
Tony's procedure of knowledge, knowledge dawn upon him from outside, from other
characters, after his several attempts.
Throughout the
novel, everyone tries to give him hints or signs. Though he has inability to
understand signs, which are in front of his eyes, and get the 'sense', he can
reach to knowledge because of his ability to accept his inabilities, and to
become objective with knowing his own self. He knows his barrier of his
knowledge and tries to go beyond it, to overcome it.
Conclusion:
Thus,
Tony's journey to his knowable space is going on expanding in the second part
and he tries to overcome from his subjective relationship with his self. At
last we can say that, in the novel, Tony, the narrator's quest for knowledge is
interesting and amazing, and worthy to study. It becomes very exiting end when
Tony meets with his knowledge and gets “his
sense” after long journey.
Works Cited
Wikipedia contributors. "The Sense of an
Ending." Wikipedia, The
Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 24 Jan. 2016. Web. 26
Mar. 2016.
Gray, Ann. Research Practice for cultural studies. (2003).
No comments:
Post a Comment